Where’s the Panama Canal Chris?

Chris Matthews is a genius, just ask him. The MSNBC host has gone on a crusade against Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin, questioning their intelligence on a nightly basis.

With that in mind, here is Chris Matthews explaining the significance of Egypt‘s Panama Canal:

Has Matthews mixed up the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal? How do we know? It is only safe to assume that Chris Matthews is a “balloon head” who doesn’t know any geography. Who’s writing this stuff for him?

Who is Meghan McCain?

The self-appointed moderate martyr, guttersnipe Meghan McCain, took potshots at Michele Bachmann and Sarah Plain last night on MSNBC:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I mean I think it’s important to note that Michele Bachmann is not a leader and she is not the leader of the Republican Party. Michele Bachmann in my opinion is no better than a poor man’s Sarah Palin. And I think the fact that Fox and MSNBC elected not to run this is admirable to the kind of journalism that Fox and MSNBC is airing. I think that CNN should be ashamed of themselves for airing this. She is one rogue woman who couldn’t even look into the camera directly and I take none of it seriously…

This self-righteous, pretentious ditz just wont go away. Where does McCain come off saying “Michele Bachmann in my opinion is no better than a poor man’s Sarah Palin”? When Ms. McCain was on TV bemoaning her “crucifixion” at the hands of conservatives, was this the type of high-minded rhetoric she preferred people use?

What was it that Meghan McCain accomplished that raised her to a recognized political commentator again? By now everyone understands McCain’s game. She personally insults conservatives in order to be fawned over by the media. A sad and pathetic existence.

Strictly Right Radio episode 77

On this Strictly Right, Ari examines the Alinskyite tactics of the Left, the failure of socialized medicine in the UK, why people lie about Ronald Reagan, and much more.

Listen Online:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Subscribe to Strictly Right Radio in iTunes.

Sarah Palin v. Rules for Radicals

Last night Governor Sarah Palin appeared on Hannity for her first interview since the Arizona shooting:

The Left suffers from a collective case of extreme Palin Derangement Syndrome. No matter what happens, Sarah Palin seems to be at fault.

When Governor Palin did not respond to accusations made against her in the wake of the Arizona shooting she was criticized. When the media tried to pin the massacre on Palin, with precisely zero evidence, Palin waited four days, then responded. The media criticized her for injecting herself into the story. Additionally, the Left suddenly became originalists with regard to the term ‘blood libel,’ and branded Palin an anti-Semite for daring to using what has become a generic term.

The Left’s all-out assault on Sarah Palin came directly from the pages of their favorite guidebook:

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
-Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

Accusing Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, or any other conservative of being an incitement to murder is a serious charge that demands a forceful rebuke. The media savaged Governor Palin because she dared to fight back.

Again, the accusations made by the Left have been absurd. Is Sarah Palin really the first person to use war metaphors in a political campaign? Where do the geniuses in the media think the word ‘campaign’ comes from? Did President Johnson’s War on Poverty provoke killing sprees? As for the ‘controversial’ map SarahPAC used, to quote John Stossel, “give me a break.” If some lunatic had been inspired to violence by a map with targets, the insane person would still be to blame. Should The Catcher in the Rye be banned because John Hinckley read it?

Some people will never be satisfied. No matter what Sarah Palin does, it has to be wrong. There is no outcry over the vicious attacks launched by the left against her and her children, including her youngest son with Down syndrome. The Palin family is fair game for the Left because Sarah Palin fights back. It is difficult to recall any other politician ever subject to such relentless vitriol, all for the sin of existing. Palin’s policy positions are rarely mentioned. Instead, the Left has picked their target, attempted to freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it, using direct personalized criticism and ridicule. Saul Alinsky would be proud of his radical minions.

Tom DeLay and the Criminalization of Politics

Tom DeLay, the former Republican House Majority Leader, was recently sentenced to three years in prison, a sentence that is likely to be overturned on appeal. In fact, Judge Pat Priest, who sentenced DeLay, “acknowledged from the bench that appeals courts might not take the same view.”

The story of the witch hunt against Tom DeLay is a real life example of the liberal version of McCarthyism, only in this case the charges really are false. DeLay was the first major target in the Left’s attempt to criminalize their opposition.

To be clear, the charges against DeLay are frivolous. Beginning in 1995, Democrats, led by Nancy Pelosi, stated that their goal was to “take [DeLay] out.” SInce then, they have come after Tom DeLay with one fallacious charge after the other.

The latest charge against DeLay, which earned him a three year prison sentence, was for money laundering. DeLay’s PAC (Political Action Committee) legally raised money to pay for administrative duties. This should have been the end of the case, as Texas law requires ill-gotten money to prosecute a money laundering case.

DeLay’s PAC raised more money than it needed, and sent $190,000 to the Republican National Committee. The RNC then sent $190,000 to Republican candidates in Texas. This type of a transaction, known as a “swap,” is common practice in politics. In fact, DeLay’s PAC was copied from a model already employed by Texas Democrats.

Democrats hated Tom DeLay because he was an exceptionally effective Whip, and Majority Leader. As such, they pursued the politics of personal destruction. When Democrats could not beat DeLay, his party, or his ideas at the ballot box, they tried to criminalize his politics.

As an aside, the DA that went after DeLay, Ronnie Early is a political hack, well known for his repeated fishing expeditions against Texas Republicans.

The politics of personal destruction and the criminalization of politics has become standard operating procedure for the Left. They routinely engage in vicious character assassinations against their “enemies,” as President Obama refers to his political opposition. Additionally, Democrats have continued to use the legal system to attack conservatives.

A textbook example of the Left’s despicable tactics has been the campaign against Sarah Palin and her family. Immediately after Palin was introduced on the national scene, her entire family was subjected to a wide assortment of vicious calumny. Not content to just attack the candidate, incredibly, the media savagely maligned the Governor’s teenage daughters.

Since 2008, Sarah Palin has been the target of a relentless campaign of lies and hate, courtesy of the Left. In fact, just this week Palin was repeatedly blamed for the shooting in Arizona, despite the total lack of evidence to substantiate such a claim. When Palin dared defend herself, the media, absurdly, accused her of being an anti-Semite.

Also, Sarah Palin resigned as Governor of Alaska because she was being harassed by opponents whom abused the legal system. Palin’s opponents filed a plethora of inane ethics violations charges. The charges made against Palin were fatuous. However, they prevented Palin from being an effective governor, and buried her in legal debts at a time in her life when she could not afford a robust defense.

The Left’s character assassinations and criminalization of politics are dangerous. They will continue to steer good people away from politics, and ensure that the worst continue to rise to the top.

Bill Maher v. Reality

This week on the Tonight Show Bill Maher launched into a vicious tirade against conservatives. Mixed with his sardonic and sanctimonious curse laden diatribe were the assertions that it is only the Right that incites violence, and that people on the Left do not act out violently:

Bill Maher has a problem: he is always sure, but he is rarely right. Maher belittles anyone who dares to disagree with his learned opinions as ignorant. In reality, a place Maher must have left a long time ago, the Left constantly incites violence against conservatives. Additionally, there is a long history of leftists carrying out their violent fantasies.

First, on the inciting hatred front, why not start with Bill Maher himself?

In the following clip from Maher’s television program, the host jokes about Vice president Cheney dying, than makes the serious point that he believes it would be good if the Vice President died:

Then there was Chris Matthews of MSNBC on Hardball musing about killing Rush Limbaugh:

The website The Onion made a video lamenting that Glenn Beck has not died a painful death:

The website the Daily Caller made a four minute video, compiling tweets urging the assassination of Sarah Palin:

Palin Death Wish Tweets Re Tucson Shooting from Legal Insurrection on Vimeo.

Rep. Paul Kanjorski, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, had the following to say about Florida Governor Rick Scott, a Republican:

“instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him.”

That is just a sample of the vitriol and hate that regularly comes from the Left. Throughout the Bush Presidency the Left regularly wrote books, made movies, and otherwise advocated the assassination of George W. Bush. Maher’s claim that the Left does not incite violence is the type of absurd claim that could only be made by an ignoramus or a willful deceiver.

Maher’s second claim, that only conservatives carry out acts of violence because they are armed and insane, is equally fallacious.

In 1901 President William McKinley was assassinated by Leon Czolgosz, an anarchist, who killed the president “because he was the enemy of the good people – the good working people. I am not sorry for my crime.”

Lee Harvey Oswald, the man who assassinated President Kennedy (save your comments Oliver Stone fans), was a Communist defector, who returned to the United States in order to assist Fidel Castro.

The Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, sent 16 bombs out, killed three people and injured 23. He too was an anarchist, and a devotee of Al Gore’s.

Just last year James Lee, who was inspired by Al Gore, took hostages at the the Discovery Channel‘s headquarters because they were not doing enough to combat global warming in his estimation.

On top of all these examples there are terrorist organizations, like the Earth Liberation Front, that proudly use “economic sabotage and guerrilla warfare to stop the exploitation and destruction of the environment.”

All this is not to say that Al Gore and his cohorts on the Left are to blame for the actions of terrorists. There are bad people in the world, and their interpretations of notable works does not implicate the authors.

What all these examples do prove is that once again Bill Maher, who represents the thinking of many on the Left, has given voice to a hateful position that is at odds with reality. Maher’s despicable lies about the Right are old hat for the smear merchant. Maher would be well served if he bothered to do even minimal research before opening his mouth.

Leftwing Politician Advocates Assassinating Opponents

Not a minute after Jared Loughner opened fire on a crowd in Arizona, members of the media began frothing at the mouth, dreaming of blaming the shooting on Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Plain et al.

It turns out that Loughner is a leftwing, atheist/occult, pothead, and most importantly, mentally disturbed. However, seeing a political opportunity to attack the Right, the media did not let the facts get in the way of a convenient narrative.

One of the most sickening assertions has been that Sarah Palin is somehow responsible for the shooting, because she targeted Rep. Giffords’ district.

If Palin is responsible for the shooting of Giffords, you would expect politicians to remove similarly ‘inflammatory’ rhetoric from their websites, right? After all, with the knowledge that targeting a district inspires violence, as the media is telling us nonstop, only the most irresponsible of people would continue to incite hatred.

How about Canada’s own communist party, the NDP:

“Taking aim,” bull’s-eyes, “send Harper packing”. One can only presume that the NDP is planning on shooting targeted Conservatives, and sending them packing in body bags, right?

Of course, making such an assertion is patently absurd. Taking aim, bulls-eyes, and sending people packing are all political metaphors. If someone read that map and took it as a call to arms, they would have to be mentally unwell.

Even if a Tea Party conservative opened fire on innocent civilians, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, or any other liberal Emmanuel Goldstein would not be responsible. Some people are deranged. It is not possible to ascribe a logical reason to an illogical act. The Left’s attempt to pin the Arizona shooting on anyone but the lunatic involved is both libelous and malicious.

Strictly Right Radio episode 76

On this Strictly Right, Ari analyzes the the media and the Left’s reaction to the Arizona shooting, the hypocrisy of the Left on profiling, the success of Canada’s corporate tax cuts, the targeting of Sarah Palin by the left and more.

Listen online:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Subscribe to Strictly Right Radio in iTunes.