Reaganomics: What We Learned

From today’s Wall Street Journal:

By ARTHUR B. LAFFER

For 16 years prior to Ronald Reagan’s presidency, the U.S. economy was in a tailspin—a result of bipartisan ignorance that resulted in tax increases, dollar devaluations, wage and price controls, minimum-wage hikes, misguided spending, pandering to unions, protectionist measures and other policy mistakes.

In the late 1970s and early ’80s, 10-year bond yields and inflation both were in the low double digits. The “misery index”—the sum of consumer price inflation plus the unemployment rate—peaked at well over 20%. The real value of the S&P 500 stock price index had declined at an average annual rate of 6% from early 1966 to August 1982.

For anyone old enough today, memories of the Arab oil embargo and price shocks—followed by price controls and rationing and long lines at gas stations—are traumatic. The U.S. share of world output was on a steady course downward.

Then Reagan entered center stage. His first tax bill was enacted in August 1981. It included a sweeping cut in marginal income tax rates, reducing the top rate to 50% from 70% and the lowest rate to 11% from 14%. The House vote was 238 to 195, with 48 Democrats on the winning side and only one Republican with the losers. The Senate vote was 89 to 11, with 37 Democrats voting aye and only one Republican voting nay. Reaganomics had officially begun.

President Reagan was not alone in changing America’s domestic economic agenda. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, first appointed by Jimmy Carter, deserves enormous credit for bringing inflation down to 3.2% in 1983 from 13.5% in 1981 with a tight-money policy. There were other heroes of the tax-cutting movement, such as Wisconsin Republican Rep. Bill Steiger and Wyoming Republican Sen. Clifford Hansen, the two main sponsors of an important capital gains tax cut in 1978.
What the Reagan Revolution did was to move America toward lower, flatter tax rates, sound money, freer trade and less regulation. The key to Reaganomics was to change people’s behavior with respect to working, investing and producing. To do this, personal income tax rates not only decreased significantly, but they were also indexed for inflation in 1985. The highest tax rate on “unearned” (i.e., non-wage) income dropped to 28% from 70%. The corporate tax rate also fell to 34% from 46%. And tax brackets were pushed out, so that taxpayers wouldn’t cross the threshold until their incomes were far higher.

Changing tax rates changed behavior, and changed behavior affected tax revenues. Reagan understood that lowering tax rates led to static revenue losses. But he also understood that lowering tax rates also increased taxable income, whether by increasing output or by causing less use of tax shelters and less cheating on taxes.

Moreover, Reagan knew from personal experience in making movies that once he was in the highest tax bracket, he’d stop making movies for the rest of the year. In other words, a lower tax rate could increase revenues. And so it was with his tax cuts. The highest 1% of income earners paid more in taxes as a share of GDP in 1988 at lower tax rates than they had in 1980 at higher tax rates. To Reagan, what’s been called the “Laffer Curve” (a concept that originated centuries ago and which I had been using without the name in my classes at the University of Chicago) was pure common sense.

There was also, in Reagan’s first year, his response to an illegal strike by federal air traffic controllers. The president fired and replaced them with military personnel until permanent replacements could be found. Given union power in the economy, this was a dramatic act—especially considering the well-known fact that the air traffic controllers union, Patco, had backed Reagan in the 1980 presidential election.

On the regulatory front, the number of pages in the Federal Register dropped to less than 48,000 in 1986 from over 80,000 in 1980. With no increase in the minimum wage over his full eight years in office, the negative impact of this price floor on employment was lessened.

And, of course, there was the decontrol of oil markets. Price controls at gas stations were lifted in January 1981, as were well-head price controls for domestic oil producers. Domestic output increased and prices fell. President Carter’s excess profits tax on oil companies was repealed in 1988.

Continue

No Eugene Robinson, Democrats are NOT the Party of Reagan

In yesterday’s Washington Post, Eugene Robinson wrote an incredibly disingenuous pieces on Ronald Reagan, claiming that today’s Democrats are the party Reagan, because the GOP has moved so far to the right.

First, Robinson cited Reagan’s record as governor of California:

When he took office as governor of California in 1967, the state faced a huge budget deficit. Reagan promptly raised taxes by $1 billion – at a time when the entire state budget amounted to just $6 billion. It was then the biggest state tax increase in history.

When Ronald Reagan became Governor of California, the state faced an enormous budget shortfall. Reagan’s predecessor, Jerry Brown, used slight-of-hand bookkeeping tricks to hide the enormity of the state’s budget crisis. By the time Reagan took the helm, he had six months to balance California’s books. In order to clean-up the Democrats mess, Reagan was forced to raise taxes in his first year as Governor. However, it was not a position he enjoyed supporting:

It was not an enjoyable speech to make. I’d campaigned on a promise to keep the lid on taxes, now I was asking for an increase. But I swallowed hard and said that as soon as I could, I’d make sure we gave the people some of their money back to them.
(Am American Life p.165)

In fact, Reagan cut taxes four times as Governor, including a 1968 tax rebate of $100 million, the first in California history. The rebate was made possible by Governor Reagan’s budget surplus.

Next, Robinson claimed that as President, Ronald Reagan was not a real tax cutter:

What eludes the GOP’s selective memory is that Reagan subsequently raised taxes 11 times, beginning with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. All told, he took back roughly half of that hallowed 1981 tax cut. Why? Because he realized that the United States needed an effective federal government – and that to be effective, the government needed more money.

On this one, Robinson is again wrong. To get the facts straight, in 1980 the top marginal tax rate was 70%. In 1989, the top marginal rate had been cut down to 28%. As for the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, President Reagan absolutely did not sign it because “he realized that the United States needed an effective federal government – and that to be effective, the government needed more money.” It seems as though this explanation was invented out of thin air by Robinson.

Ronald Reagan dealt with a Democratic House his entire time in office, with a Senate going back and forth. As such, President Reagan was forced to negotiate with the Democrats. One such example was the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. While President Reagan opposed raising taxes, the Democrats promised him that for every $1 in tax hikes, there would be $3 in spending cuts. Under these pretenses, President Reagan acquiesced to a tax hike. The Democrats did not keep up their end of the bargain – for every dollar in tax increases the Democrats only cut spending by 27 cents. After this mistake, President Reagan never again raised taxes. In fact, in 1986 Reagan signed into law the most sweeping tax rate reduction in history.

Perhaps Robinson and his ilk forget who Ronald Reagan really was. After the 1964 election, where Barry Goldwater lost in a landslide to Lyndon Johnson, Ronald Reagan said:

“We don’t intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all.”

No matter what liberals now claim, Ronald Reagan was not a ‘moderate Republican.’ Ronald Reagan was a conservative champion. The attempt to whitewash his record is an attempt to deny the great successes of conservatism. Ronald Reagan communicated and implemented great ideas; conservative solutions that that still apply today.

My Interview With Craig Shirley on the Legacy of Ronald Reagan

In this interview, I discuss the legacy of President Reagan with renowned Reagan authority Craig Shirley.

The interview focuses on three specific fields: Ronald Reagan’s fight for the GOP nomination, how the Gipper changed his party, and what President Reagan’s legacy really means.

Today, many have fallen victim to a form of presentism: a belief that just because things turned out the way they did, the course of history was inevitable. President Reagan’s fight for the GOP nomination was far from inevitable, and his election in 1980 was even less certain at the time.

This year, the first GOP presidential debate will be held at the Reagan Library. From around the country, every Republican now claims to be a Reaganite. However, things were very different when Ronald Reagan was seeking his party’s nomination. Reagan had run against Gerald Ford, the sitting president, in the 1976 for the GOP nomination. Much of the GOP’s establishment reviled Reagan. Conservatives were looked down upon in the party. As such, President Reagan was painted as a far-right extremist that had no hope in a general election. President Reagan’s win in 1980 reshaped the Republican Party, and changed the American political landscape forever.

Historians have made a conscious effort to whitewash President Reagan’s true legacy. Members of the GOP establishment claim Reagan as one of theirs today. We are told that Ronald Reagan was a great pragmatist and that he only spoke ‘conservative’ to appease the base. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Ronald Reagan was a conservative champion, and the elites hated him for that. Reagan’s conservatism guided him throughout his presidency.

Listen online:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Happy Birthday, Mr. President

Today would have been Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday. This presents us all with an opportunity to reflect on what a great man, and president he really was.

As a movie star he played the Gipper. As Governor he literally saved the state of California. And then as President of the United States he created the economic conditions that fostered unfettered growth for 25 years and won the Cold War.

President Reagan campaigned for human rights abroad and rescued nearly one billion people from behind the horrors of the iron curtain. He defended freedom and opposed tyranny – and he won. As he would say “all in all, not bad, not bad at all.” Happy birthday Mr. President.